IronVault vs Google Password Manager
Google Password Manager is free and frictionless inside Chrome. IronVault is a zero-knowledge vault that does more and works everywhere. Here's how they compare.
At a glance
| Feature | IronVault | Google Password Manager |
|---|
| Encryption | AES-256-GCM, PBKDF2 600,000 (SHA-256) | Encrypted in transit and at rest |
| Zero-knowledge | Yes, by design | Only if you enable on-device encryption (off by default) |
| Free | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in 2FA authenticator (TOTP) | Yes | No (Google Authenticator is a separate app) |
| Beyond passwords | Cards, crypto seed phrases, identities, notes, documents (OCR), subscriptions, expenses, investments | Passwords and passkeys |
| Where it works | Browser extension plus standalone iOS and Android apps | Best inside Chrome and on Android |
| Biometric unlock | Yes | Yes (device-dependent) |
Where IronVault stands out
- Zero-knowledge by design, not an optional setting.
- A built-in authenticator, plus cards, crypto, notes and documents.
- Works across browsers and as a full app, not tied to Chrome.
Where Google Password Manager stands out
- Completely free and deeply integrated with Chrome and Android.
- Zero setup if you already live in Google's ecosystem.
Which should you choose?
Google Password Manager is fine for basic password storage inside Chrome. If you want a zero-knowledge vault for more than passwords, with a built-in authenticator and cross-browser support, IronVault is the broader, more private option.
Back to IronVault home · IronVault vs Google Password Manager (2026)